linux-kernel - Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:28:56 -0800
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree

Hi Ingo and Thomas-

There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week.

--Andy


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Date: Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:35 AM
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, "Luck, Tony"
<tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org


On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:08:39PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the luto-misc tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c between commit 83737691e586 ("x86,
> mce: Fix sparse errors") from the tip tree and commit d4812e169de4
> ("x86, mce: Get rid of TIF_MCE_NOTIFY and associated mce tricks") from
> the luto-misc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the latter removed some of the code changed by the
> former) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).

That must be the piece of the hunk touching mce_info. Yes, the correct
solution is to follow what d4812e169de4 does.

Thanks Stephen :)

---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index 800d423f1e92..d23179900755 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -1004,51 +1004,6 @@ static void mce_clear_state(unsigned long *toclear)
 }

 /*
- * Need to save faulting physical address associated with a process
- * in the machine check handler some place where we can grab it back
- * later in mce_notify_process()
- */
-#define        MCE_INFO_MAX    16
-
-struct mce_info {
-       atomic_t                inuse;
-       struct task_struct      *t;
-       __u64                   paddr;
-       int                     restartable;
-} mce_info[MCE_INFO_MAX];

--
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--


-- 
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/