linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 Jan 2015 20:06:26 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
	Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-audit@...hat.com,
	Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount
 root fs

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:06:27AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 01/21/2015 10:29 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 05:32:13AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>Another data point (though I have no idea if it is useful or what it means):
> >>
> >>In the working case, path_init sets nd->flags to 0x50 or 0x51.
> >>In the non-working case (ie for all files with a '/' in the name),
> >>it sets nd->flags to 0x10 or 0x11, even though it is always called
> >>with the LOOKUP_RCU bit set in flags.
> >
> >Umm...  Are those path_init() succeeding or failing?  Note that path_init()
> >includes "walk everything except for the last component", so your non-working
> >case is "have it walk anything at all".  What's failing there?  path_init()
> >or handling the remaining component?
> >
> path_init() returns -2. Guess that explains the unexpected flags ;-).
> The failuere is from
> 	link_path_walk()
> 		walk_component()

Which is to say, lookup gave it a negative dentry.  OK, let's just make
vfs_mkdir() and walk_component() print what they are doing; on top of
linux-next

diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 323957f..8a4e22f 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -1586,8 +1586,11 @@ static inline int walk_component(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *path,
 		inode = path->dentry->d_inode;
 	}
 	err = -ENOENT;
-	if (!inode || d_is_negative(path->dentry))
+	if (!inode || d_is_negative(path->dentry)) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR "walk_component[%p,%pd4] -> negative\n",
+			path->dentry, path->dentry);
 		goto out_path_put;
+	}
 
 	if (should_follow_link(path->dentry, follow)) {
 		if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU) {
@@ -3521,6 +3524,7 @@ int vfs_mkdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode)
 	error = dir->i_op->mkdir(dir, dentry, mode);
 	if (!error)
 		fsnotify_mkdir(dir, dentry);
+	printk(KERN_ERR "mkdir[%p,%pd4] => %d\n", dentry, dentry, error);
 	return error;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfs_mkdir);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/