lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:58:20 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
cc:	Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@...eaurora.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	mgorman@...e.de, minchan@...nel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: compaction: fix the page state calculation in
 too_many_isolated

On Wed, 21 Jan 2015, Vlastimil Babka wrote:

> On 01/21/2015 10:34 AM, Vinayak Menon wrote:
> > Commit "3611badc1baa" (mm: vmscan: fix the page state calculation in
> 
> That appears to be a -next commit ID, which won't be the same in Linus' tree, so
> it shouldn't be in commit message, AFAIK.
> 
> > too_many_isolated) fixed an issue where a number of tasks were
> > blocked in reclaim path for seconds, because of vmstat_diff not being
> > synced in time. A similar problem can happen in isolate_migratepages_block,
> > similar calculation is performed. This patch fixes that.
> 
> I guess it's not possible to fix the stats instantly and once in the safe
> versions, so that future readings will be correct without safe, right?
> So until it gets fixed, each reading will have to be safe and thus expensive?
> 

Yeah, this patch will actually hurt performance for the migration scanner 
but not as much as stalling unnecessarily when the snapshot is the same.

> I think in case of async compaction, we could skip the safe stuff and just
> terminate it - it's already done when too_many_isolated returns true, and
> there's no congestion waiting in that case.
> 
> So you could extend the too_many_isolated() with "safe" parameter (as you did
> for vmscan) and pass it "cc->mode != MIGRATE_ASYNC" value from
> isolate_migrate_block().
> 

Or just pass it struct compact_control *cc and use both cc->zone and 
cc->mode inside this compaction-only function.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ