linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5 v2] tracing: Automatically mount tracefs on debugfs/tracing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:22:07 +0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5 v2] tracing: Automatically mount tracefs on
 debugfs/tracing

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 06:33:30AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 11:00:41 +0800
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > > +		if (traced->d_op) {
> > > +			/*
> > > +			 * FIXME:
> > > +			 * Currently debugfs sets the d_op by a
> > > side-effect
> > > +			 * of calling simple_lookup(). Normally,
> > > we should
> > > +			 * never change d_op of a dentry, but as
> > > this is
> > > +			 * happening at boot up and shouldn't be
> > > racing with
> > > +			 * any other users, this should be OK. But
> > > it is still
> > > +			 * a hack, and needs to be properly done.
> > > +			 */
> > > +			trace_ops = *traced->d_op;
> > > +			trace_ops.d_automount = trace_automount;
> > > +			traced->d_flags |= DCACHE_NEED_AUTOMOUNT;
> > > +			traced->d_op = &trace_ops;
> > > +		} else {
> > > +			/* Ideally, this is what should happen */
> > > +			trace_ops = simple_dentry_operations;
> > > +			trace_ops.d_automount = trace_automount;
> > > +			d_set_d_op(traced, &trace_ops);
> > 
> > How will this else block run if debugfs is setting d_op in the
> > debugfs_create_dir() call?
> 
> It wont; I put the else block there to show what we would like to do.
> And would hopefully work if debugfs ever changed.
> 
> 
> > 
> > What really do you want to do here, just automount a filesystem on
> > debugfs?  If so, can't we just add a new debugfs call to do that?
> 
> We could add a call to debugfs to do that. Would you prefer that? From
> talking with Al, it sounds to me that changing d_ops on the fly is very
> racy. Adding a call in debugfs sounds like it would be open for other
> users to do the same and do so while the system is running. Would that
> be wise?

If we could do it in a non-racy way, that would be good, otherwise I
don't see us being able to even take this patch :(

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/