linux-kernel - Re: N900 v3.19-rc5 arm atags_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:06:11 -0500 (EST)
From:	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
cc:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
	linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
	Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: N900 v3.19-rc5 arm atags_to_fdt.c is broken

On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> > > > $ du -b arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dtb 
> > > > 70212   arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dtb
> > > > 
> > > > $ echo $((0x10000))
> > > > 65536
> > > > 
> > > > I would say, problem is because omap3-n900 binary DT is too large
> > 
> > I agree.
> > 
> > > OK if that's the case, then your patch makes sense to me. It also
> > > seems we can have the temporary stack be larger than the initial
> > > stack just for atags_to_fdt.
> > 
> > The stack size isn't the issue, but rather its location.  We need to 
> > position it away from the DT data.  The DT size is known and we could 
> > use that, plus some room for the insertion of new data coming from the
> > ATAG conversion.
> > 
> > Something like the following would be a more robust solution:
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S
> > index 68be901759..89718de9dd 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S
> > @@ -263,16 +263,37 @@ restart:	adr	r0, LC0
> >  		 * OK... Let's do some funky business here.
> >  		 * If we do have a DTB appended to zImage, and we do have
> >  		 * an ATAG list around, we want the later to be translated
> > -		 * and folded into the former here.  To be on the safe side,
> > -		 * let's temporarily move  the stack away into the malloc
> > -		 * area.  No GOT fixup has occurred yet, but none of the
> > -		 * code we're about to call uses any global variable.
> > +		 * and folded into the former here. No GOT fixup has occurred
> > +		 * yet, but none of the code we're about to call uses any
> > +		 * global variable.
> >  		*/
> > -		add	sp, sp, #0x10000
> > +
> > +		/* Get the initial DTB size */
> > +		ldr	r5, [r6, #4]
> > +#ifndef __ARMEB__
> > +		/* convert to little endian */
> > +		eor	r1, r5, r5, ror #16
> > +		bic	r1, r1, #0x00ff0000
> > +		mov	r5, r5, ror #8
> > +		eor	r5, r5, r1, lsr #8
> > +#endif
> > +		/* 50% DTB growth should be good enough */
> > +		add	r5, r5, r5, lsr #1
> > +		/* preserve 64-bit alignment */
> > +		add	r5, r5, #7
> > +		bic	r5, r5, #7
> > +		/* clamp to 32KB min and 1MB max */
> > +		movs	r1, r5, lsr #15
> > +		moveq	r5, #(1 << 15)
> > +		movs	r1, r5, lsr #20
> > +		movne	r5, #(1 << 20)
> 
> Dunno. Would it be easier/simpler to just use 1MB, always? Do we
> support machines with <16MB RAM?

If people are used to put other things relatively close to the kernel 
image like, say, some initrd image, then I'd prefer to be more 
conservative and avoid spreading out too much.


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/