[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 12:49:32 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, monstr@...str.eu,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>,
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE <yoshihiro.yunomae.ez@...achi.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tty: serial: 8250_core: Check that port->line is >=0
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 09:09 +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 01/31/2015 12:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 03:55:08PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> >> This patch should be the part of:
> >> "tty: serial: 8250_core: use the ->line argument as a hint in
> >> serial8250_find_match_or_unused()"
> >> (sha1: 59b3e898ddfc81a65975043b5eb44103cc29ff6e)
> >>
> >
> > How can I go back in time and add a patch to another one?
>
> ok. Let me rewrite it to make more sense. Definitely not asking
> you to squash that to the patch. It is just pointer to origin
> patch which added this code and which should be extended with this one.
I guess you can use Fixes tag for that, though it doesn't sound like a
fix.
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
>
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists