linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] phy: qcom-ufs: export symbols needed by main drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:26:48 +0100
From:	"hch@....de" <hch@....de>
To:	James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>
Cc:	"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
	"dovl@...eaurora.org" <dovl@...eaurora.org>,
	"ygardi@...eaurora.org" <ygardi@...eaurora.org>,
	"kishon@...com" <kishon@...com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: qcom-ufs: export symbols needed by main drivers

On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 03:30:27PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> Cc added for linux-scsi, since this is the origin of the problem.  How
> important is bisectability in this?  It won't affect any non-embedded
> user, since most don't build with UFS, so I can go either way on folding
> or just applying as an extra patch.

The CRYPTO_DEV_QCOM_ICE symbol was never defined in the scsi trees, and
would have needed something else from linux-next to even compile.  So I
don't think the revert is a problem at all, and I'll add it to the
scsi-for-3.20 branch ASAP.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/