[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 14:22:15 -0400
From: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/1] cpufreq: exynos: allow modular build
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:33:09AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 1 February 2015 at 00:29, Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com> wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >
<big cut>
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Thanks!
>
> Now as these are all compilable as modules, should we look into the drivers as
> well to see what they are doing on module unload ?
hmm.. it seams to be the case, yes. From a quick look, there are unreleased resources
that needs to be freed. However, they are not really on module unload,
but on device removal. Which should be a reproducible but even today, in
case one manually unbinds the device.
Let me have a look here and will be sending something soon.
Thanks,
Eduardo Valentin
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists