[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:39:42 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: ethan zhao <ethan.zhao@...cle.com>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
santosh shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend] cpufreq: Set cpufreq_cpu_data to NULL before
putting kobject
On 2 February 2015 at 09:36, ethan zhao <ethan.zhao@...cle.com> wrote:
> Is that an idea it supposed to be or fact ?
>
> if (!cpufreq_suspended)
> cpufreq_policy_free(policy);
>
> static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> free_cpumask_var(policy->related_cpus);
> free_cpumask_var(policy->cpus);
> kfree(policy);
> }
>
> It seems you just think about it ideally in mind.
if (!cpufreq_suspended)
cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy);
static void cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
...
kobject_put(kobj);
/*
* We need to make sure that the underlying kobj is
* actually not referenced anymore by anybody before we
* proceed with unloading.
*/
pr_debug("waiting for dropping of refcount\n");
wait_for_completion(cmp);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists