linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: don't trigger recovery for normal umount image

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 05 Feb 2015 16:18:04 +0800
From:	Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
To:	'Jaegeuk Kim' <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc:	'Changman Lee' <cm224.lee@...sung.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: don't trigger recovery for normal umount image

Hi Jaegeuk,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@...nel.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 7:32 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: Changman Lee; linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: don't trigger recovery for normal umount image
> 
> Hi Chao,
> 
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 04:59:49PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> > Our recovery option is on by default, so we will try to recover data for
> > a normally umounted image when mounting it, but no data will be recovered.
> >
> > So it'd be better to skip the recovery for above condition.
> 
> No.
> We should consider the existing UMOUNT flag written by old f2fs.

You're right, compatibility should be considered, my mistaken.

Please ignore this patch.

Thanks,


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/