linux-kernel - Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v13 3/6] clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk instances

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:01:34 +0100
From:	Quentin Lambert <lambert.quentin@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
CC:	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	t-kristo@...com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v13 3/6] clk: Make clk API return per-user struct
 clk instances


On 06/02/2015 03:15, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Thanks for the coccinelle patch. Thinking more about it, I don't think
> we care if the pointer is dereferenced because that would require a
> definition of struct clk and that is most likely not the case outside of
> the clock framework. Did you scan the entire kernel?
No I haven't.
> I'm running it now
> but it seems to be taking a while.
>
Yes, that's why, as a first step, I chose to limit the scan to the arm 
directory.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/