linux-kernel - [PATCH] perf: fix building error in x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:01:08 +0800
From:	He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
To:	<namhyung@...nel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
	<hekuang@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf: fix building error in x86_64

When build with ARCH=x86_64, perf failed to compile with following error:

tests/builtin-test.o:(.data+0x158): undefined reference to `test__perf_time_to_tsc'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile.perf:632: recipe for target 'perf' failed
...

Which is caused commit c6e5e9fbc3ea1 ("perf tools: Fix building error
in x86_64 when dwarf unwind is on"), ARCH test in Makefile.perf
conflicts with tests/builtin-test.c's __x86_64__.
To x86/x86_64 platform, ARCH should always override to x86 while
IS_64_BIT stands for the actual architecture.

Signed-off-by: He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
---
 tools/perf/config/Makefile.arch | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/config/Makefile.arch b/tools/perf/config/Makefile.arch
index ff95a68..8c6214d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/config/Makefile.arch
+++ b/tools/perf/config/Makefile.arch
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ ifeq ($(RAW_ARCH),i386)
 endif

 ifeq ($(RAW_ARCH),x86_64)
-  ARCH ?= x86
+  override ARCH := x86

   ifneq (, $(findstring m32,$(CFLAGS)))
     RAW_ARCH := x86_32
-- 
2.2.0.33.gc18b867

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/