linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 RESEND] clk: mxs: Fix invalid 32-bit access to frac registers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:10:21 -0200
From:	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To:	Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Cc:	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, Zhi Li <lznuaa@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 RESEND] clk: mxs: Fix invalid 32-bit access to frac registers

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com> wrote:

>> I always get 0x5e5b5513 with or without your patch.
>
> very strange. Do you have any idea why IO1_STABLE is permanent low?

On my case it is always 1.

> Can you confirm the behavior according to your flash issue?

In my tests IO1_STABLE stays the same.

> I think it would be the best to revert my patch. Sorry for the trouble.

To be on the safe side, I agree.

Could you please send a revert patch?

Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/