lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:46:49 +0800
From:	Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>
To:	<nicolas.ferre@...el.com>, <linux@...im.org.za>,
	<linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC:	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <sylvain.rochet@...secur.com>,
	<alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	<patrice.vilchez@...el.com>, <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	<mark.rutland@....com>, <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	<wenyou.yang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] pm: at91: move the copying the sram function to the sram initializationi phase

To decrease the suspend time, move copying the sram function to the sram
initialization phase, instead of every time go to suspend.

In the meanwhile, substitute fncpy() for memcpy().

If there is no sram allocated for PM, the PM is not supported.

Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c |   16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
index f358e7d..9feee81 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
 #include <linux/atomic.h>
 #include <asm/mach/time.h>
 #include <asm/mach/irq.h>
+#include <asm/fncpy.h>
 
 #include <mach/cpu.h>
 #include <mach/hardware.h>
@@ -161,9 +162,6 @@ static int at91_pm_enter(suspend_state_t state)
 			 * turning off the main oscillator; reverse on wakeup.
 			 */
 			if (slow_clock) {
-				/* copy slow_clock handler to SRAM, and call it */
-				memcpy(slow_clock, at91_slow_clock, at91_slow_clock_sz);
-
 				slow_clock(at91_pmc_base, at91_ramc_base[0],
 					   at91_ramc_base[1],
 					   at91_pm_data.memctrl);
@@ -306,6 +304,13 @@ static void __init at91_pm_sram_init(void)
 
 	sram_pbase = gen_pool_virt_to_phys(sram_pool, sram_base);
 	slow_clock = __arm_ioremap_exec(sram_pbase, at91_slow_clock_sz, false);
+	if (!slow_clock) {
+		pr_warn("SRAM: Could not map\n");
+		goto put_node;
+	}
+
+	/* Copy the slow_clock handler to SRAM */
+	slow_clock = fncpy(slow_clock, &at91_slow_clock, at91_slow_clock_sz);
 
 put_node:
 	of_node_put(node);
@@ -318,7 +323,10 @@ static void __init at91_pm_init(void)
 	if (at91_cpuidle_device.dev.platform_data)
 		platform_device_register(&at91_cpuidle_device);
 
-	suspend_set_ops(&at91_pm_ops);
+	if (slow_clock)
+		suspend_set_ops(&at91_pm_ops);
+	else
+		pr_info("AT91: PM not supported, due to no SRAM allocated\n");
 }
 
 void __init at91rm9200_pm_init(void)
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ