linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc: re-enable dynticks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:08:39 +1100
From:	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:	Paul Clarke <pc@...ibm.com>
Cc:	"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: re-enable dynticks

On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 13:38 -0600, Paul Clarke wrote:
> implement arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() for powerpc
> 
> Commit 9b01f5bf3 introduced a dependency on "IRQ work self-IPIs" for 
> full dynamic ticks to be enabled, by expecting architectures to 
> implement a suitable arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() routine.
> 
> Several arches have implemented this routine, including x86 (3010279f) 
> and arm (09f6edd4), but powerpc was omitted.
> 
> This patch implements this routine for powerpc.
> 
> The symptom, at boot (on powerpc arch systems) with "nohz_full=<CPU 
> list>" is displayed:
>      NO_HZ: Can't run full dynticks because arch doesn't support irq 
> work self-IPIs
> 
> after this patch:
>      NO_HZ: Full dynticks CPUs: <CPU list>.
> 
> Tested against 3.19.

It makes the message change, but is that correct? ie. do we actually implement
"IRQ work self-IPIs"?

> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq_work.h 
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq_work.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..18365ec
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq_work.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +#ifndef _ASM_IRQ_WORK_H
> +#define _ASM_IRQ_WORK_H
> +
> +#include <asm/processor.h>
> +
> +static inline bool arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(void)
> +{
> +	return 1;

Should be "true";

> +}

cheers


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/