lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 21 Feb 2015 18:33:28 +0900
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Peter Rosin <peda@...ator.liu.se>
Cc:	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: pcm512x: Allow independently overclocking PLL,
 DAC and DSP

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:02:48PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
> From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
> 
> When using non-standard rates, a relatively small amount of overclocking
> can make a big difference to a number of cases.

This is all basically fine but I'm wondering why this is being
configured via sysfs and not via ALSA controls?  It's going to be more
fiddly for people to have to work with both control methods when they
need to configure these things.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ