lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 22 Feb 2015 21:13:23 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	swarren@...dotorg.org, lee@...nel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, galak@...eaurora.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: bcm2835: Add header file for pinctrl constants

On Sunday 22 February 2015 16:59:56 Charles Keepax wrote:
> +
> +/* IRQ Flags */
> +#define BCM2835_PIN_IRQ_RISING                         1
> +#define BCM2835_PIN_IRQ_FALLING                                2
> +#define BCM2835_PIN_IRQ_EDGE   (BCM2835_PIN_IRQ_RISING | \
> +                                BCM2835_PIN_IRQ_FALLING)
> +#define BCM2835_PIN_IRQ_LOW                            4
> +#define BCM2835_PIN_IRQ_HIGH                           8

Are these different from the standard definitions?

> +/* Pin Function Settings */
> +#define BCM2835_PIN_FUNC_GPIO_IN                       0
> +#define BCM2835_PIN_FUNC_GPIO_OUT                      1
> +#define BCM2835_PIN_FUNC_ALT5                          2
> +#define BCM2835_PIN_FUNC_ALT4                          3
> +#define BCM2835_PIN_FUNC_ALT0                          4
> +#define BCM2835_PIN_FUNC_ALT1                          5
> +#define BCM2835_PIN_FUNC_ALT2                          6
> +#define BCM2835_PIN_FUNC_ALT3                          7

Why are these required? They don't seem to be used by any driver,
which leads me to suspect that they are just the hardware numbers.

In that case, don't add any syntactical sugar like that and just
use the hardware numbers directly.

What's with the strange mapping of numbers anyway?

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ