lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:12:23 +0000
From:	Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...inux.com,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, wim@...ana.be, linux@...ck-us.net,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH v3 7/8] rtc: st: add new driver for ST's
 LPC RTC

Hi Lee,

On Wed, 18 Feb 2015, Lee Jones wrote:

> ST's Low Power Controller (LPC) controls two devices; watchdog and RTC.
> Only one of the devices can be used at any one time.  This is enforced
> by the correlating MFD driver.  This portion of the driver-set controls
> the Real Time Clock.

<snip>

> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc->lock, flags);
> +
> +	writel(1, rtc->ioaddr + LPC_WDT_OFF);
> +
> +	writel(msb, rtc->ioaddr + LPC_LPA_MSB_OFF);
> +	writel(lsb, rtc->ioaddr + LPC_LPA_LSB_OFF);
> +	writel(1, rtc->ioaddr + LPC_LPA_START_OFF);
> +
> +	writel(0, rtc->ioaddr + LPC_WDT_OFF);

I think all the writel IO accessors in this driver can be replaced
with the *_relaxed variant. This will avoid the overhead of taking a
spinlock in the l2 outer cache part of writel.

<snip>

> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int st_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct st_rtc *rtc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	writel(1, rtc->ioaddr + LPC_WDT_OFF);
> +	writel(0, rtc->ioaddr + LPC_LPA_START_OFF);
> +	writel(0, rtc->ioaddr + LPC_WDT_OFF);

Is there a reason for not disabling the IP clock in suspend / resume functions?

regards,

Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ