linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: divider: fix calculation of maximal parent rate for a given divider

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Feb 2015 08:32:58 +0100
From:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: divider: fix calculation of maximal parent rate
 for a given divider

On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 11:40:23AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> The rate provided at the output of a clk-divider is calculated as:
> 
> 	DIV_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, div)
> 
> since commit b11d282dbea2 (clk: divider: fix rate calculation for
> fractional rates). So to yield a rate not bigger than r parent_rate
> must be <= r * div.
> 
> The effect of choosing a parent rate that is too big as was done before
> this patch results in wrongly ruling out good dividers.
> 
> Note that this is not a complete fix as __clk_round_rate might return a
> value >= its 2nd parameter. Also for dividers with
> CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST set the calculation is not accurate. But this
> fixes the test case by Sascha Hauer that uses a chain of three dividers
> under a fixed clock.
> 
> Fixes: b11d282dbea2 (clk: divider: fix rate calculation for fractional rates)
> Suggested-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>

Acked-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>

This gives clk_round_rate/clk_set_rate on dividers a consistent
behaviour. Also the testcases I posted seem to work fine.

The only thing that might not be nice is that when a divider can only
output fractional rates then the next higher integer value has to be used
for clk_round_rate/clk_set_rate. A consumer should probably make no
assumptions whether 333.333Hz is rounded up or down and use 334Hz to be
sure anyway.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/