linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/13] x86/microcode/intel: Move mc arg last in get_matching

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Feb 2015 17:24:07 +0100
From:	Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@...cle.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] x86/microcode/intel: Move mc arg last in
 get_matching_{microcode|sig}

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:37:09AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> @@ -153,16 +152,15 @@ int get_matching_sig(unsigned int csig, int cpf, void *mc, int rev)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * return 0 - no update found
> - * return 1 - found update
> + * Returns 1 if update has been found, 0 otherwise.
>   */
> -int get_matching_microcode(unsigned int csig, int cpf, void *mc, int rev)
> +int get_matching_microcode(unsigned int csig, int cpf, int rev, void *mc)

Why not rename the function to is_microcode_matching() while at it? :)

Quentin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/