linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] capabilities: Ambient capability set V1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 03:32:47 +0000
From:	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Aaron Jones <aaronmdjones@...il.com>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...uxfoundation.org,
	"Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@...nel.org>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>,
	Markku Savela <msa@...h.iki.fi>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] capabilities: Ambient capability set V1

Quoting Christoph Lameter (cl@...ux.com):
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> 
> > Unless I'm misunderstanding what you are saying, apps do have surprises.
> > They drop capabilities, execute a file, and the result has capabilities
> > which the app couldn't have expected.  At least if the bits have to be
> > in fI to become part of pP', the app has a clue.
> 
> Well yes but the surprises do not occur in the cap bits they are
> manipulating or inspecting via prctl.
> 
> > To be clear, I'm suggesting that the rules at exec become:
> >
> > pI' = pI
> 
> Ok that is new and on its own may solve the issue?

No that's not new.

> > pA' = pA  (pA is ambient)
> 
> Thats what this patch does
> 
> > pP' = (X & fP) | (pI & (fI | pA))
> 
> Hmmm... fP is empty for the file not having caps. so
> 
> pP' = pI & pA

Right.

> > pE' = pP' & fE
> 
> fE? So the inherited caps are not effective? fE would be empty for a file
> not having caps thus the ambient caps would not be available in the child.

Yeah we could make this

pE' = pP' & (fE | pA)

-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/