linux-kernel - Re: Trying to use 'perf probe' to debug perf itself

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:57:42 +0900
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Trying to use 'perf probe' to debug perf itself

(2015/02/25 22:25), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:53:16AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
>> (2015/02/25 3:49), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>> Available variables at thread__get
>>>         @<thread__get+0>
>>>                 struct thread*  thread
>>> [root@...andy ~]#
> 
>>> cool, so I thought it would be just a matter of asking to put the probes
>>> and get the value of 'thread', then match things, but:
> 
>>> [root@...andy ~]# perf probe -v ~/bin/perf thread__put thread
> <SNIP>
>>> Writing event: p:probe_perf/thread__put /root/bin/perf:0xd03d2 thread=-32(%sp):u64
>>> Failed to write event: Invalid argument
>>>   Error: Failed to add events. Reason: Invalid argument (Code: -22)
>>> [root@...andy ~]#
> 
>>> Not possible :-\ 
>  
>> Hmm, strange. Could you tell me the version of your kernel?
> 
> [root@...andy ~]# uname -r
> 3.10.0-210.el7.x86_64
> 
>> It seems that the kernel newer than 3.14 supports uprobes with
>> memory dereference (e.g. -32(%sp) )feature.
> 
> Right, that must be the case, will test, but then, would it be possible
> for the kernel, in such cases, return something line EOPNOTSUP?

Yeah, but for now, it is already supported in kernel.
Of cause we can try to test feature with adding temporary event
from perftools too.

> I will try to figure out a better error message on the tooling side,
> something like:
> 
> . Realize we're asking for memory dereference in uprobes
> . If it fails with EINVAL, check the kernel version and say something
>   like:
> 
> Please upgrade your kernel to at least x.y.z to have access to feature
> FOO_BAR.

OK, it may be worth for users (I'm not sure RHEL can update their kernel
to include that enhancement)

Thank you,

> 
> - Arnaldo
> 
>> (it was actually introduced by 5baaa59e, and git-describe told
>>  it was v3.13-rc4-22-g5baaa59)
>>
>> And also, could you try to write the result command to uprobe_event as
>> below?
>>
>> # echo "p:probe_perf/thread__put /root/bin/perf:0xd03d2 thread=-32(%sp):u64" >> \
>>  /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
> 
> Well, I'll try that if it fails after I upgrade to 3.14.
> 
>>> please let me know if you need some file, here is the readelf -wi for
>>> those two routines:
>>
>> This should not be the problem of dwarf-analysis. It seems kernel-side
>> (uprobe) problem.
> 
> Thanks a lot!
> 
> - Arnaldo
> 


-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/