lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 26 Feb 2015 01:19:09 -0500
From:	green@...uxhacker.ru
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] incorrect cpumask behavior with CPUMASK_OFFSTACK

From: Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>

I just got a report today from Tyson Whitehead <twhitehead@...il.com>
that Lustre crashes when CPUMASK_OFFSTACK is enabled.

A little investigation revealed that this code:
        cpumask_t                       mask;
...
        cpumask_copy(&mask, topology_thread_cpumask(0));
        weight = cpus_weight(mask);

that was supposed to calculate number of cpu siblings/partitions returns
a crazy high number over 3000 which is impossible as I only have
8 cpu cores on my system.

So after a bit of digging I found out that:
cpumask_copy only copies up to nr_cpumask_bits (actual number of cpus I
have in the system),
where as cpumask_weight actully tries to count bits up to NR_CPUS.

Not only calculating up to NR_CPUS is wasteful in this case, and
since we know how many cpus we have in the system - it only makes sense
to calculate only this much anyway, it's wrong because the copy only copied
8 bits to our variable and the rest of it is some random stack garbage.

So I propose two patches here, the first one I am more certain about -
operations that operate on current cpuset like cpus_weight, but also
cpus_empty, cpus_$LOGICALop cpus_$BINARYop are converted from NR_CPUS to
nr_cpumask_bits (this is ok when CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK is not set as it's
then defined to NR_CPUS anyway).
I am leaving __cpus_setall __cpus_clear out of it as these two look like
they deal with entire set and it would be useful for them to operate on
all NR_CPUS bits for the case if more cpus are added later and such.

The second patch that I am not sure if we wnat, but it seems to be useful
until struct cpumask is fully dynamic is to convert what looks like
whole-set operations e.g. copies, namely:
cpumask_setall, cpumask_clear, cpumask_copy to always operate on NR_CPUS
bits to ensure there's no stale garbage left in the mask should the
cpu count increases later.

I checked the code and allocating cpumasks on stack is not all that 
uncommon in the code, so this should be a worthwhile fix.

Please consider.

Oleg Drokin (2):
  cpumask: Properly calculate cpumask values
  cpumask: make whole cpumask operations like copy to work with NR_CPUS
    bits

 include/linux/cpumask.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ