lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:54:33 +0100
From:	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	Andrey Wagin <avagin@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 v3] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct pt_regs"

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Denys Vlasenko
<vda.linux@...glemail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Denys Vlasenko
> <vda.linux@...glemail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>> In addition to my previous tests, I ran my home machine with
>> patched kernel. Unfortunately, it works for me :(
>>
>> Will try on yet another machine.
>
> And voila, it does happen on another machine :)
>
> I'm debugging it right now. Looks like 64-bit syscalls just stop working
> at some point in new processes. That is, existing process is alive and well,
> but children get SEGV after fork (most likely on any syscall64 they do,
> not after fork per se. They eventually manage to kill themselves -
> not trivial when exit syscall isn't working either - by tripping on HLT insn).
>
> 32-bit syscalls (int 80) continue to work. Fork, exec, whatever you want.
> I have static 32-bit busybox binary and everything works there.
>
> Also, any 64-bit process which was under strace continues to work correctly,
> including forks and execs.
>
> This points towards some bug on fast path sysret64 code. Looking for it.

audit=0 makes crashes disappear.

I found the problem. If syscall_trace_enter_phase1 returns 0,
I restore %rax from pt_regs->ax, but should restore it from
pt_regs->orig_ax:

        call syscall_trace_enter_phase1
        test %rax, %rax
        jnz tracesys_phase2             /* if needed, run the slow path */
-       RESTORE_C_REGS                  /* else restore clobbered regs */
+       RESTORE_C_REGS_EXCEPT_RAX       /* else restore clobbered regs */
+       movq ORIG_RAX-ARGOFFSET(%rsp),%rax
        jmp system_call_fastpath        /*      and return to the fast path */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ