linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] Add proper support for Compulab CM-A510/SBC-A510

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:01:27 -0700
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
CC:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Gabriel Dobato <dobatog@...il.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Add proper support for Compulab CM-A510/SBC-A510

On 02/26/2015 12:39 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 26.02.2015 18:55, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>> On 17/02/2015 19:52, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>>> This patch set improves current mainline support for the Compulab
>>> CM-A510 System-on-Module (SoM) and its default Compulab SBC-A510
>>> base board. Thanks to Gabriel Dobato who agreed to remote debug and
>>> test the provided DT changes.
> [...]
>>> Sebastian Hesselbarth (8):
>>>    i2c: mux-pinctrl: Rework to honor disabled child nodes
>>>    devicetree: vendor-prefixes: Add CompuLab to known vendors
>>>    ARM: dts: dove: Fix uart[23] reg property
>>>    ARM: dts: dove: Always include gpio and interrupt-controller headers
>>>    ARM: dts: dove: Add node labels for PCIe ports 0 and 1
>>>    ARM: dts: dove: Add some more common pinctrl settings
>>>    ARM: dts: dove: Add internal i2c multiplexer node
>>>    ARM: dts: dove: Add proper support for Compulab CM-A510/SBC-A510
>>
>> Patches 3 to 6 applied on mvebu/dt
>>
>> If I understood well patches 7 and 8 depend on patch 1 which had not been
>> taken yet.
>
> Correct. Once I get a Tested-by from Stephen, I'll resend the 4
> remaining patches.

Me? For which patch? I thought there was going to be a v2 of the i2c mux 
driver patch given the comments on it, but perhaps I'm misremembering?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/