linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] hwrng: iproc-rng200

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:26:02 -0800
From:	Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"Ian Campbell" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
	Jonathan Richardson <jonathar@...adcom.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>,
	Anatol Pomazao <anatol@...gle.com>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] hwrng: iproc-rng200 - Add Broadcom IPROC RNG driver

Hi Arnd,

Latency is 32 us for 32bits of data - commented inline.  What delay call 
do you recommend in this case?

On 15-02-26 12:15 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 26 February 2015 11:37:20 Scott Branden wrote:
>> Response inline.
>>
>> On 15-02-25 11:17 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 25 February 2015 10:16:24 Scott Branden wrote:
>>>> This adds a driver for random number generator present on Broadcom
>>>> IPROC devices.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>
>>>
>>> The driver looks reasonable overall, I have just one question about
>>> something that sticks out:
>>>
>>>> +    while ((num_remaining > 0) && time_before(jiffies, idle_endtime)) {
>>> ...
>>>> +
>>>> +            /* Are there any random numbers available? */
>>>> +            if ((ioread32(rng_base + RNG_FIFO_COUNT_OFFSET) &
>>>> +                            RNG_FIFO_COUNT_RNG_FIFO_COUNT_MASK) > 0) {
>>> ...
>>>> +            } else {
>>>> +                    if (!wait)
>>>> +                            /* Cannot wait, return immediately */
>>>> +                            return max - num_remaining;
>>>> +
>>>> +                    /* Can wait, give others chance to run */
>>>> +                    cpu_relax();
>>>> +            }
>>>> +    }
>>>> +
>>>
>>> It looks like you do a busy-loop around cpu_relax here if asked to wait.
>>> Is this intentional? I would normally expect either cond_resched() or
>>> some msleep() instead.
>>
>> This code was following examples of other open source drivers - bcm2835
>> and exynos both use cpu_relax.  I'll have to look into this more to
>> understand.
>>
>
> The majority of the driver apparently use udelay(10) to wait, which is
> not much better but at least consistent. The cpu_relax() call probably
> gives better throughput.
>
> I don't understand why none of the drivers actually attempts to
> msleep(), but that may be because the delay is much too long.
>
> Can you find out what the expected latency is for new data to
> become available on your hardware?
RNG generates at a nominal 1 Mbps.  So to generate 32 bits of data takes
approximately 32 us.

>
> 	Arnd
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/