[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 05:19:12 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 01/14] etherdevice: Add eth_<foo>_addr
CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS code
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 19:54 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> Make the memset possibly more efficient with the appropriate
> CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS #ifdef
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> ---
> include/linux/etherdevice.h | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/etherdevice.h b/include/linux/etherdevice.h
> index 606563e..22ad94a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/etherdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/etherdevice.h
> @@ -192,7 +192,12 @@ static inline void eth_random_addr(u8 *addr)
> */
> static inline void eth_broadcast_addr(u8 *addr)
> {
> +#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
> + *(u32 *)addr = 0xffffffff;
> + *(u16 *)(addr + 4) = 0xffff;
> +#else
> memset(addr, 0xff, ETH_ALEN);
> +#endif
> }
>
I am pretty sure compiler already does an inline, and might chose to
emit equivalent instructions for :
*(u16 *) addr = 0xffff;
*(u32 *)(addr + 2) = 0xffffffff;
if (addr % 4) is known to be 2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists