[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 20:04:42 +0000
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"acme@...hat.com" <acme@...hat.com>,
"a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xiakaixu@...wei.com" <xiakaixu@...wei.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: "linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [tip:perf/core] Revert "perf: Remove the extra validity check
on nr_pages"
>
>
> * tip-bot for Kan Liang <tipbot@...or.com> wrote:
>
> > --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> > @@ -4446,7 +4446,7 @@ static int perf_mmap(struct file *file, struct
> vm_area_struct *vma)
> > * If we have rb pages ensure they're a power-of-two number, so
> we
> > * can do bitmasks instead of modulo.
> > */
> > - if (!is_power_of_2(nr_pages))
> > + if (nr_pages != 0 && !is_power_of_2(nr_pages))
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> Hm, what does is_power_of_2(0) return? It should return 0, because 0 is
> not a power of 2!
>
> and if it's fixed to return 0, then the check should properly be something
> like:
>
> if (!nr_pages || !is_power_of_2(nr_pages))
>
> or so?
nr_pages == 0 is valid, we cannot return -EINVAL. Because
vma_size = vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start;
nr_pages = (vma_size / PAGE_SIZE) - 1;
So here we only want to check is_power_of_2
when the pages > 1 (or nr_pages > 0).
Thanks,
Kan
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists