lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 4 Mar 2015 00:53:47 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Dan Ehrenberg <dehrenberg@...omium.org>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	gwendal@...omium.org, ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vfs: Use 12:20 bit major:minor in stat everywhere

On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:37:00PM -0800, Dan Ehrenberg wrote:
> Previously, stat on 32-bit platforms used old-style encoding and
> validation of major-minor pairs, with 8:8 bits. However, dev_t is
> 32-bits on these platforms, and coreutils seems to be treating the
> values as 12:20 new-style values. The only reason to use the old
> version is in the implementation of a legacy filesystem format which
> only has 16 bits of space. Communicating a 12:20 value to userspace
> when sizeof dev_t == 4 can be done on either a 32-bit or 64-bit
> platform.
> 
> This patch removes the artificial restriction in major:minor size.
> The only backwards incompatibility which results is sometimes stat
> succeeds if -EOVERFLOW would be returned otherwise. The legacy
> old-style stat call is retained as-is.

Umm...  You do realize that coreutils are _very_ far from being the only
userland programs handling the data returned by stat(2), right?

What's to guarantee that your ABI change won't break any of those?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ