linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: nand: jz4780: driver for NAND devices on JZ4780 SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 05 Mar 2015 20:13:43 +0100
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@...tec.com>
Cc:	dwmw2@...radead.org, computersforpeace@...il.com,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: nand: jz4780: driver for NAND devices on
 JZ4780 SoCs

On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 17:27 +0000, Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,359 @@
> +/*
> + * JZ4780 BCH controller
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2015 Imagination Technologies
> + * Author: Alex Smith <alex@...x-smith.me.uk>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
> + * Free Software Foundation;  either version 2 of the  License, or (at your
> + * option) any later version.
> + */

This states the license is GPL v2 or later.

> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

So you probably want
    MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

here.

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_nand.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,373 @@
> +/*
> + * JZ4780 NAND driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2015 Imagination Technologies
> + * Author: Alex Smith <alex@...x-smith.me.uk>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
> + * Free Software Foundation;  either version 2 of the  License, or (at your
> + * option) any later version.
> + */

This states the license is GPL v2 or later.

> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL V2");

So, again, you probably want
    MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

here.

Actually "GPL V2" would taint the kernel on module load.

(This all assumes we're talking about two separate modules here. I don't
speak "Makefile" enough to be sure.)


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/