linux-kernel - Re: intel_soc_dts_thermal binding issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 9 Mar 2015 09:11:54 -0400
From:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
To:	"Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>
Cc:	"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	"edubezval@...il.com" <edubezval@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: intel_soc_dts_thermal binding issues

On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas
<srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 08:51 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Zhang, Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com> wrote:
>> > Please attach the acpidump output.
>>
>> Attached for my machine.
>>
> There is no INT3401 in the acpi dump. Also no one registered IRQ 86.
> So the request_irq failing.
> It is not a problem, this platform can't support.
> Do we want to silently bail out?

That's what I was originally suggesting, yes.  People see the failing
request_irq in dmesg and think it's an error.

josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/