linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio / ACPI: Avoid unnecessary checks in __gpiod_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:36:15 +0800
From:	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio / ACPI: Avoid unnecessary checks in __gpiod_get_index()

On 2015/3/11 6:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> If dev is NULL in __gpiod_get_index() and both ACPI and OF are
> enabled, it will be checked twice before the code decides to give
> up with DT/ACPI lookup, so avoid that.
>
> Also use the observation that ACPI_COMPANION() is much more efficient
> than ACPI_HANDLE(), because the latter uses the former and carries out
> a check and a pointer dereference on top of it, so replace the
> ACPI_HANDLE() check with an ACPI_COMPANION() one which does not
> require the additional IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) check too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Quite straight forward to me, for both two patches,

Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>

Thanks
Hanjun

> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c |   16 +++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -1865,13 +1865,15 @@ struct gpio_desc *__must_check __gpiod_g
>  
>  	dev_dbg(dev, "GPIO lookup for consumer %s\n", con_id);
>  
> -	/* Using device tree? */
> -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev && dev->of_node) {
> -		dev_dbg(dev, "using device tree for GPIO lookup\n");
> -		desc = of_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &lookupflags);
> -	} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) && dev && ACPI_HANDLE(dev)) {
> -		dev_dbg(dev, "using ACPI for GPIO lookup\n");
> -		desc = acpi_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &lookupflags);
> +	if (dev) {
> +		/* Using device tree? */
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node) {
> +			dev_dbg(dev, "using device tree for GPIO lookup\n");
> +			desc = of_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &lookupflags);
> +		} else if (ACPI_COMPANION(dev)) {
> +			dev_dbg(dev, "using ACPI for GPIO lookup\n");
> +			desc = acpi_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &lookupflags);
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> .
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/