lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 17 Mar 2015 08:51:39 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	keescook@...omium.org, ast@...mgrid.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
	oleg@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	hpa@...or.com, wad@...omium.org, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry/64: Remove unused
 thread_struct::usersp


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:

> Assuming this does not fix the regression, could you apply the 
> minimal patch below - which reverts the old_rsp handling change.

Assuming this solves the regression (it really should, it's now 
equivalent to a full revert minus comments):

> @@ -395,6 +398,8 @@ __switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct task_struct *next_p)
>  	/*
>  	 * Switch the PDA and FPU contexts.
>  	 */
> +	prev->usersp = this_cpu_read(old_rsp);
> +	this_cpu_write(old_rsp, next->usersp);
>  	this_cpu_write(current_task, next_p);
>  
>  	/*

can you confirm that your guest (sometimes) uses SYSENTER to do 
syscalls?

If yes then my theory is that we broke SYSENTER (or SYSEXIT) support - 
and that this would not be visible in our normal tests of KVM because 
SYSCALL is used most of the time.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ