linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the jc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Mar 2015 12:33:03 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Adrian Remonda <adrianremonda@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the jc_docs tree

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:23:54PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Clearly the one commit in the jc_docs tree is supposed to do the same
> as three commits in the spi tree.  The jc_docs tree version has an
> older Author date, but a newer commit date ...

> I fixed it up (by using the spi tree version of the file) and can carry
> the fix as necessary (no action is required).

That's the fix I'd expect, thanks.

> BTW, there is a function in there called "unespcape" whose comment
> calls it "Unescape" which would make more sense.

Probably, yes...

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)