lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 26 Mar 2015 18:19:09 +0300
From:	Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@...sung.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Maria Guseva <m.guseva@...sung.com>,
	Yury Gribov <y.gribov@...sung.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: fix integer overflow in ELF_ET_DYN_BASE

On 03/26/2015 06:05 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 02:12:52PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>> Usually ELF_ET_DYN_BASE is 2/3 of TASK_SIZE. With 3G/1G user/kernel
>> split this is not so, because 2*TASK_SIZE overflows 32 bits,
>> so the actual value of ELF_ET_DYN_BASE is:
>> 	(2 * TASK_SIZE / 3) = 0x2a000000
>>
>> When ASLR is disabled PIE binaries will load at ELF_ET_DYN_BASE address.
>> On 32bit platforms AddressSanitzer uses addresses [0x20000000 - 0x40000000]
>> for shadow memory [1]. So ASan doesn't work for PIE binaries when ASLR disabled
>> as it fails to map shadow memory.
>> Also after Kees's 'split ET_DYN ASLR from mmap ASLR' patchset PIE binaries
>> has a high chance of loading somewhere in between [0x2a000000 - 0x40000000]
>> even if ASLR enabled. This makes ASan with PIE absolutely incompatible.
>>
>> Fix overflow by dividing TASK_SIZE prior to multiplying.
>> After this patch ELF_ET_DYN_BASE equals to (for CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G=y):
>> 	(TASK_SIZE / 3 * 2) = 0x7f555554
>>
>> [1] https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/AddressSanitizerAlgorithm#Mapping
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@...sung.com>
>> Reported-by: Maria Guseva <m.guseva@...sung.com>
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> 
> Who's handling this patch?  I'm guessing it should be me, so if it could
> find its way into my patch system for when I next apply a bunch of patches,
> that'd be good.
> 

It's already there. Patch number - 8320/1.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ