linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] dmaengine: of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 28 Mar 2015 02:44:46 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc:	vinod.koul@...el.com, tony@...mide.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	grant.likely@...aro.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	robh+dt@...nel.org, nm@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] dmaengine: of_dma: Support for DMA routers

On Friday 27 March 2015, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> +Required property:
> +- dma-device:          phandle of the DMA controller. The router is modifying
> +                       the DMA requests for this controller.

This property seems rather specific to the case at hand, I would expect that
one might also see routers like this that are connected to more than one
dma-device, so maybe make it a list?

It might also be better to name this as 'dma-controllers' or 'dma-masters',
as it is not entirely obvious (without referencing the binding document)
whether a dma device refers to the slave or the master.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/