linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry: Remove user_mode_ignore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 29 Mar 2015 06:24:29 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry: Remove user_mode_ignore_vm86()

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 11:02:34AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> So how about doing the patch below?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>       Ingo
>>
>> ===================================>
>> From 6677d6f073cfda7f1036eb06d13faaad5c6742cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
>> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 09:10:08 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry: Remove user_mode_ignore_vm86()
>>
>> user_mode_ignore_vm86() can be used instead of user_mode(), in
>> places where we have already done a v8086_mode() security
>> check of ptregs.
>>
>> But doing this check in the wrong place would be a bug that could
>> result in security problems, and also the naming still isn't very clear.
>>
>> Furthermore, it only affects 32-bit kernels, while most development
>> happens on 64-bit kernels.
>>
>> If we replace them with user_mode() checks then the cost is only a
>> very minor increase in various slowpaths:
>>
>>    text             data   bss     dec              hex    filename
>>    10573391         703562 1753042 13029995         c6d26b vmlinux.o.before
>>    10573423         703562 1753042 13030027         c6d28b vmlinux.o.after
>>
>> So lets get rid of this distinction once and for all.
>>
>> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
>> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
>> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
>> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h    | 17 -----------------
>>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c |  2 +-
>>  arch/x86/kernel/traps.c          |  6 +++---
>>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> I had some doubts about people using user_mode_ignore_vm86() in the
> wrong way and thus introducing sec. bugs.
>
> Since this is only on the slow path, simplifying the code makes sense to
> me.
>
> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
>

Ditto.

Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>

> --
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
>
> ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
> --



-- 
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/