linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] bpf: Suggestion on bpf syscall interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:23:24 -0700
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To:	He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
CC:	wangnan0@...wei.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"daniel@...earbox.net >> Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] bpf: Suggestion on bpf syscall interface

On 3/29/15 8:13 PM, He Kuang wrote:
>
> By using current bpf syscalls, we should keep the program which
> attaches bpf programs running background, use it or some other
> processes communicate with it to adjust maps parameters, like
> sample rate for sys_write.

You can do all of the above by passing fds between processes. I still
don't see a need for sysfs.

> In current implementation, we have to use a large and relative
> heavy daemon to deal with loading, configuration, adjusting and
> unloading works together.

This daemon is actually small and simple.
Just take a look how Daniel did for tc:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/456387/
In that example 3 programs are sharing maps and single bpf_agent
monitors maps. Note that tc loaded programs and exited while
agent keeps running. Very straightforward.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/