linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Balanced slots, attempt #2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:11:07 +0200
From:	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...math.org>,
	Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@...hat.com>
CC:	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Balanced slots, attempt #2

Hi,

On 31-03-15 00:09, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, it occurs that the balanced slots assignment introduced in v4.0 had some
> troubles and the Synaptics part was reverted.
> I tried to spend some time today to figure out a solution, and the only way
> I can get something from it is to add a band aid in input_mt_set_slots().
>
> It should not be very costly, but I think it is required: I can guarantee that
> the path is hit if the band aid is not here (pr_err was my friend).
>
> So the series is:
> - band aid
> - revert the revert
> - small fix in synaptics.c to keep the slots stable when landing a third finger.
>
> Cheers,
> Benjamin

The entire set looks good to me:

Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>

Regards,

Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/