lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 31 Mar 2015 08:50:45 +0000
From:	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Naoya Horiguchi" <nao.horiguchi@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] mm: don't call __page_cache_release for hugetlb

__put_compound_page() calls __page_cache_release() to do some freeing works,
but it's obviously for thps, not for hugetlb. We didn't care it because PageLRU
is always cleared and page->mem_cgroup is always NULL for hugetlb.
But it's not correct and has potential risks, so let's make it conditional.

Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
---
 mm/swap.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git v4.0-rc6.orig/mm/swap.c v4.0-rc6/mm/swap.c
index cd3a5e64cea9..8e46823c3319 100644
--- v4.0-rc6.orig/mm/swap.c
+++ v4.0-rc6/mm/swap.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
 #include <linux/memcontrol.h>
 #include <linux/gfp.h>
 #include <linux/uio.h>
+#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
 
 #include "internal.h"
 
@@ -75,7 +76,14 @@ static void __put_compound_page(struct page *page)
 {
 	compound_page_dtor *dtor;
 
-	__page_cache_release(page);
+	/*
+	 * __page_cache_release() is supposed to be called for thp, not for
+	 * hugetlb. This is because hugetlb page does never have PageLRU set
+	 * (it's never listed to any LRU lists) and no memcg routines should
+	 * be called for hugetlb (it has a separate hugetlb_cgroup.)
+	 */
+	if (!PageHuge(page))
+		__page_cache_release(page);
 	dtor = get_compound_page_dtor(page);
 	(*dtor)(page);
 }
-- 
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ