linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/11] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Rename arch_timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Mar 2015 17:14:02 +0300
From:	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
	ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk, digetx@...il.com, hdegoede@...hat.com,
	laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Rename arch_timer_probed to reflect behaviour

Hi Ingo,

On Tuesday 31 March 2015 09:14:52 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
> > From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>
> > 
> > The arch_timer_probed function returns whether the given time doesn't
> > need to be probed. This can be the case when the timer has been probed
> > already, but also when it has no corresponding enabled node in DT.
> > 
> > Rename the function to arch_timer_need_probe and invert its return value
> > to better reflect the function's purpose and behaviour.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 13 +++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c index a3025e7..50bb7f2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > @@ -661,17 +661,17 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> > arch_timer_mem_of_match[] __initconst = {> 
> >  };
> >  
> >  static bool __init
> > 
> > -arch_timer_probed(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches)
> > +arch_timer_need_probe(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches)
> 
> If we do a rename we might as well use valid English spelling such as
> 'arch_timer_needs_probing()'?

Of course. Should I resend the patch or can you fix that while applying it ?

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/