lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 2 Apr 2015 21:21:54 -0400
From:	Zhihui Zhang <zzhsuny@...il.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not use arbitrary large movablecore to calculate kernelcore

If you specify movablecore > totalpages, required_kernelcore will end
up with a big number because corepages is an unsigned integer. If so,
the following nested is a waste of time. But I see your point.

-Zhihui

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:36:02PM -0400, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
>> If kernelcore is not set, then we are working with a very large kernelcore
>> for nothing - no movable zone will be created. If kernelcore is set,
>> then it is not respected at all.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhihui Zhang <zzhsuny@...il.com>
>
> I'm confused. What bug is this patch fixing? What is the user-visible
> impcat of the patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ