linux-kernel - Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH 1/2] x86: add support for the non-standard protected e820 type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 03 Apr 2015 14:54:04 -0600
From:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH 1/2] x86: add support for the
 non-standard protected e820 type

On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 10:12 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 09:12 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >   :
> >> @@ -748,7 +758,7 @@ u64 __init early_reserve_e820(u64 size, u64 align)
> >>  /*
> >>   * Find the highest page frame number we have available
> >>   */
> >> -static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn, unsigned type)
> >> +static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn)
> >>  {
> >>       int i;
> >>       unsigned long last_pfn = 0;
> >> @@ -759,7 +769,11 @@ static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn, unsigned type)
> >>               unsigned long start_pfn;
> >>               unsigned long end_pfn;
> >>
> >> -             if (ei->type != type)
> >> +             /*
> >> +              * Persistent memory is accounted as ram for purposes of
> >> +              * establishing max_pfn and mem_map.
> >> +              */
> >> +             if (ei->type != E820_RAM && ei->type != E820_PRAM)
> >>                       continue;
> >
> > Should we also delete this code, accounting E820_PRAM as ram, along with
> > the deletion of reserve_pmem() in this version?
> 
> should revert those end_of_ram change as attached.

I confirmed that the pmem driver works with the change, and last_pfn is
updated as expected.

Thanks,
-Toshi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/