linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/Kconfig: Fix allnoconfig without explicitly specified ARCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 4 Apr 2015 11:35:25 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/Kconfig: Fix allnoconfig without explicitly
 specified ARCH


* Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:

> On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 19:23 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 05:33:03PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > Well, "when building on 32 bits" it currently suffices to do:
> > >     make allnoconfig
> > > 
> > > and the patch changes that.
> > 
> > Hmm, so this would need more staring. The fact that 64-bit needs to set
> > CONFIG_64BIT, we would need a way to say:
> > 
> > 	option allnoconfig_y if ARCH = "x86"
> > 
> > And Kconfig doesn't support that yet...
> 
> The fact that "make allnoconfig" and "make allyesconfig" can give you
> a .config for another subarchitecture is annoying. [...]

Absolutely! No 'make *config' option should change the current 
.config's architecture, except if ARCH= is specified on the command 
line.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/