| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 22:55:47 -0400
From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@...il.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale.com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@...com>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Subject: [PATCH v15 12/15] pvqspinlock, x86: Enable PV qspinlock for Xen
This patch adds the necessary Xen specific code to allow Xen to
support the CPU halting and kicking operations needed by the queue
spinlock PV code.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
---
arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
kernel/Kconfig.locks | 2 +-
2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
index 956374c..728b45b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
@@ -17,6 +17,55 @@
#include "xen-ops.h"
#include "debugfs.h"
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, lock_kicker_irq) = -1;
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(char *, irq_name);
+static bool xen_pvspin = true;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_QUEUE_SPINLOCK
+
+#include <asm/qspinlock.h>
+
+static void xen_qlock_kick(int cpu)
+{
+ xen_send_IPI_one(cpu, XEN_SPIN_UNLOCK_VECTOR);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Halt the current CPU & release it back to the host
+ */
+static void xen_qlock_wait(u8 *byte, u8 val)
+{
+ int irq = __this_cpu_read(lock_kicker_irq);
+
+ /* If kicker interrupts not initialized yet, just spin */
+ if (irq == -1)
+ return;
+
+ /* clear pending */
+ xen_clear_irq_pending(irq);
+
+ /*
+ * We check the byte value after clearing pending IRQ to make sure
+ * that we won't miss a wakeup event because of the clearing.
+ *
+ * The sync_clear_bit() call in xen_clear_irq_pending() is atomic.
+ * So it is effectively a memory barrier for x86.
+ */
+ if (READ_ONCE(*byte) != val)
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * If an interrupt happens here, it will leave the wakeup irq
+ * pending, which will cause xen_poll_irq() to return
+ * immediately.
+ */
+
+ /* Block until irq becomes pending (or perhaps a spurious wakeup) */
+ xen_poll_irq(irq);
+}
+
+#else /* CONFIG_QUEUE_SPINLOCK */
+
enum xen_contention_stat {
TAKEN_SLOW,
TAKEN_SLOW_PICKUP,
@@ -100,12 +149,9 @@ struct xen_lock_waiting {
__ticket_t want;
};
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, lock_kicker_irq) = -1;
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(char *, irq_name);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct xen_lock_waiting, lock_waiting);
static cpumask_t waiting_cpus;
-static bool xen_pvspin = true;
__visible void xen_lock_spinning(struct arch_spinlock *lock, __ticket_t want)
{
int irq = __this_cpu_read(lock_kicker_irq);
@@ -217,6 +263,7 @@ static void xen_unlock_kick(struct arch_spinlock *lock, __ticket_t next)
}
}
}
+#endif /* CONFIG_QUEUE_SPINLOCK */
static irqreturn_t dummy_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
@@ -280,8 +327,16 @@ void __init xen_init_spinlocks(void)
return;
}
printk(KERN_DEBUG "xen: PV spinlocks enabled\n");
+#ifdef CONFIG_QUEUE_SPINLOCK
+ __pv_init_lock_hash();
+ pv_lock_ops.queue_spin_lock_slowpath = __pv_queue_spin_lock_slowpath;
+ pv_lock_ops.queue_spin_unlock = PV_CALLEE_SAVE(__pv_queue_spin_unlock);
+ pv_lock_ops.wait = xen_qlock_wait;
+ pv_lock_ops.kick = xen_qlock_kick;
+#else
pv_lock_ops.lock_spinning = PV_CALLEE_SAVE(xen_lock_spinning);
pv_lock_ops.unlock_kick = xen_unlock_kick;
+#endif
}
/*
@@ -310,7 +365,7 @@ static __init int xen_parse_nopvspin(char *arg)
}
early_param("xen_nopvspin", xen_parse_nopvspin);
-#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_DEBUG_FS
+#if defined(CONFIG_XEN_DEBUG_FS) && !defined(CONFIG_QUEUE_SPINLOCK)
static struct dentry *d_spin_debug;
diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.locks b/kernel/Kconfig.locks
index 537b13e..0b42933 100644
--- a/kernel/Kconfig.locks
+++ b/kernel/Kconfig.locks
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ config ARCH_USE_QUEUE_SPINLOCK
config QUEUE_SPINLOCK
def_bool y if ARCH_USE_QUEUE_SPINLOCK
- depends on SMP && (!PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS || !XEN)
+ depends on SMP
config ARCH_USE_QUEUE_RWLOCK
bool
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists