linux-kernel - Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] rtc: OMAP: Add external 32k clock feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:23:55 +0200
From:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Cc:	Keerthy <a0393675@...com>, Igor Grinberg <grinberg@...pulab.co.il>,
	Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] rtc: OMAP: Add external 32k clock feature

On 10/04/2015 at 13:37:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote :
> Is there any way in which we can get all systems working properly?  If
> there's no way of auto-detecting an external oscillator then perhaps a
> module parameter is needed.  If so, it would be better if the driver
> were to default to internal oscillator (ie: current behaviour), and the
> module parameter selects the external oscillator.  This way, existing
> systems are unaffected by the kernel upgrade.
> 

Actually, I would use the common clock framework, allowing to chose
between the internal and an external clock source by using the "clocks"
property. This would also allow to have the correct reference count on
that 32k internal clock. It may not matter now but for example, not
doing so became a problem on at91.

As a fallback, if no clocks property is available, I would use the
internal 32k to keep DT ABI backward compatibility.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/