linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 00/10] latched RB-trees and __module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:11:26 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	mingo@...nel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, oleg@...hat.com,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
	linux@...izon.com, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 00/10] latched RB-trees and __module_address()

This series is aimed at making __module_address() go fast(er).

The reason for doing so is that most stack unwinders use kernel_text_address()
to validate each frame. Perf and ftrace (can) end up doing a lot of stack
traces from performance sensitive code.

On the way there it:
 - annotates and sanitizes module locking
 - introduces the latched RB-tree
 - employs it to make __module_address() go fast.

I've build and boot tested this on x86_64 with modules and lockdep
enabled.  Performance numbers (below) are done with lockdep disabled.

As previously mentioned; the reason for writing the latched RB-tree as generic
code is mostly for clarity/documentation purposes; as there are a number of
separate and non trivial bits to the complete solution.

As measued on my ivb-ep system with 84 modules loaded; prior to patching
the test module (below) reports (cache hot, performance cpufreq):

          avg +- stdev
Before:   611 +- 10 [ns] per __module_address() call
After:     17 +-  5 [ns] per __module_address() call

PMI measurements for a cpu running loops in a module (also [ns]):

Before:	Mean: 2719 +- 1, Stdev: 214, Samples: 40036
After:  Mean:  947 +- 0, Stdev: 132, Samples: 40037

Note; I have also tested things like: perf record -a -g modprobe
mod_test, to make 'sure' to hit some of the more interesting paths.

Changes since last time:

 - reworked generic latch_tree API (Lai Jiangshan)
 - reworked module bounds (me)
 - reworked all the testing code (not included)

Rusty, please consider merging this (for 4.2, I know its the merge window, no
rush)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/