| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:34:11 -0700 From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> To: "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@...com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org> Subject: Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [GIT PULL] PMEM driver for v4.1 On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) <Elliott@...com> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Linux-nvdimm [mailto:linux-nvdimm-bounces@...ts.01.org] On Behalf >> Of Ingo Molnar >> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 7:42 AM >> To: Christoph Hellwig >> Subject: Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [GIT PULL] PMEM driver for v4.1 >> >> > ... >> Since it's directly mapped it should just work for most things if it's >> at least write-through cached (UC would be a horror), and it would >> also solve all the size problems. With write-through caching it should >> also be pretty OK performance-wise. The 64 bytes size is ideal as > > Are the WT support patches going to make it into 4.1? Which patches are these? Maybe I missed them, but I don't see anything in the archives. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists