linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] cpuset: Add knob to make allowed masks hotplug invariant on legacy hierarchy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 15 Apr 2015 10:30:35 -0500
From:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, tj@...nel.org,
	svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lizefan@...wei.com, anton@...ba.org, bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] cpuset: Add knob to make allowed masks hotplug
 invariant on legacy hierarchy

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 05:19:26PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:03:02AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> 
> > Peter, is the question "why can't we just use the unified hierarchy for
> > cpusets"?
> 
> No, the question is why can't you use the unified hierarchy cpuset
> semantics -- without the actual unified hierarchy stuff.

Ok - that I don't know the answer to.  Does sound like it would
simplify things, reduce # of sets of semantics.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/