lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 17 Apr 2015 10:39:16 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	jgross@...e.com, roland@...estorage.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch for 4.0] x86: silence warning in /dev/mem support


* Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:

> On Thu 2015-04-16 12:09:54, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> > 
> > > The compiler is right, the code is tricky, but it is also correct
> > > AFAICT.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> > > index fdf617c..8a8dce8 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> > > @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ void *xlate_dev_mem_ptr(phys_addr_t phys)
> > >  
> > >  	addr = (void __force *)ioremap_cache(start, PAGE_SIZE);
> > >  	if (addr)
> > > -		addr = (void *)((unsigned long)addr | (phys & ~PAGE_MASK));
> > > +		addr = (void *)((unsigned long)addr | (unsigned long) (phys & ~PAGE_MASK));
> > 
> > What warning did it generate and which compiler version?
> 
> 
>   CC      arch/x86/mm/ioremap.o
>   arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c: In function ‘xlate_dev_mem_ptr’:
>   arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:363:10: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
>      addr = (void *)((unsigned long)addr | (phys & ~PAGE_MASK));
>                ^
>   LD      arch/x86/mm/built-in.o
> 		 
> pavel@amd:/data/l/linux$ gcc --version
> gcc (Debian 4.9.2-10) 4.9.2

So this code has not been changed for a year or so in theory, and I've 
never seen this warning with GCC 4.9.1. I'm wondering how it 
triggered. Could you send me your .config that triggers this?

Must have been introduced in:

  4707a341b4af /dev/mem: Use more consistent data types

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ